720 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 18, 2012 11:46  ·  Delete

  ad this:

  http://happinessofbeing.blogspot.com/2009/10/holy-indifference-and-love-to-be-self.html

  actually I was trying to get to the hierarchy --it has a set of emotions, basically it has judgment way at the bottom and indifference at the top-i didnt find it so I posted that link
  there does seem to be a similarity between these teachings and those of the founding fathers or John Locke ....

  Justice must be indifferent in order for it to be just, its a tautology. Morality must be indifferent to the place of a person in a society for it to be utilitarian, the best for the whole and individual. Judgment is imperfection. To do anything other than this is the collective assertion of murder on an arbitrary and illusory basis. If you like to think of it this way, the state \ becomes the murderer on behalf of all of its weak subjects because it hides behind the illusory social mores that give it its power. Communism was the biggest killer in the 20th century but because it was done in the name of the people and the party, psychopaths got away with crimes against humanity. This goes on every day with our collective complacency and isn't too different from what andre breivitch did in Norway. Our society's stalin is replaced with bankers and politicians , thats all. Its just that one action is done by an individual and although terribly reprehensible, one action is socially unacceptable, while the other which is just as equally reprehensible is socially acceptable because it is done in the silence of time and the lullaby of illusory social mores by the collective. These social mores silently kill people....through the digestion of the bureaucratic process at the future expense of millions of people, just so a plutocracy can make a few bucks while it lasts.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 18, 2012 11:46  ·  Delete

  Because the meaning of life is meaning (ism) and if there is a contradiction in how we gain meaning and what we believe is true logically (through lack of courage or whatever), then the logic must inevitably conform to the meaning in order for their to be a purpose for existence in a such bureaucracy-The meaning would then be an insanity. However, there really is no insanity because a deterministic order is beneath everything we observe, there is no chaos, so really its a conflict in the Mind--But any limited construct of the mind cannot solve the imperfections in the system because it just creates a higher order imperfection-- all defined constructs are limited. However, the emanation of being and attitude is limitless. Since the observation affects what is observed, just having the right emanation of being or emotion changes the observation over time, as it is a limitless construct (perhaps this is why the 'dictionary of words' increasingly gets smaller over time in 1984? people are increasingly being forced to emanate from being). Its like observing an atom with a certain persistent force, it will affect the reality, however if you start getting into limited constructs of the mind you will get into a game theory spiral where a problem is solved but creates a higher order imperfection that requires an even more complex construct of mind. So you find that to really change the reality you need a semantic operator of sorts that consistently matches the outside, and this can only come from an emanation at the level of being, which the mind cannot define (hence the insanity) .We do this in the womb, its a sort of frequency that allows us to 'self justify' as we are unconcerned and simply have a general emanation of beingness (you could call it love). We lose this in life because our desire to control takes over, our ego. And hence this limitless then escapes us. An emanation of being is limitless it can change reality. Therefore, the more enlightened a society the more it will emanate from being and eventually lead to the dissapearance of the state, as the individual then becomes godlike (you start changing reality because your 'attitude' or emanation of beingness, whether it be love or whatever, then acts as a 'lamp' that forces what is being observed-a reality- to self justify into a higher order/complexity by rule of one. You stop looking in order to 'see what is going on', defining it, and instead see that all reality is self jusitfying and by emanating a sort of feeling of goodness, a reality that is not defined comes into existence to match your emanation-- it just naturally 'heals' your body, like Jesus Christ, you can then do other things as well). The more ignorant, weak and vulnerable the individual behaves, the more the state compensates by becoming increasingly more godlike. The purpose is the same as mentioned previously--its the same point--the ism where we become godlike (free will/dualistic 0,1 constructs are illusions and only relevant/real in direct proportion to our lack of courage to follow our convictions.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 18, 2012 10:22  ·  Delete

  "you do see it is possible dont you winston?"

  -1984

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55d7gMLqxqc&feature=relmfurian

  A totalitarian order is enlightened if people do not follow their convictions--One of the resentments of the dark is that the light gets so outraged but often never follows through with its convictions, so what does anything mean if no one has the courage to follow through? In a totalitarian regime history has effectively 'stopped' because all the complascency of the past has lead to a 'null zone' of repetition that cannot be escaped UNLESS people go through with their convictions. Therefore, the scene with the rats is really man in conflict with his easy eagerness to go on a bunny path toward an ideal (the liberty to say 2+2=4) yet not recognize the sacrifice, that unless its met with courage to follow through the system will fall to the deepest pit. Every individual action is responsible for everyone else over time, so in a society where people have been on average pretty complascent any individual who reflects this complacency in his/her thoughts is a menace to society, hence the term 'thought crime'. Bureaucracies may be boring but they instill self discipline to those who are eager to float to the top of the sky with an ideal but dont have the balls to follow through. They are the opposite reflection of the ideal in the higher realm--the mind of God where free will is non existent because people can only operate the by who they are, , they are also really of one mind. Therefore a totalitarian regime is the epitome of enlightment for any society who is too complascent and lacks courage. Again, the state is a projection of the inner mind. The more complacent individuals are in a society and the more idealistic, then the state grows in order to arbitrate that complacency just as a matter of symmetry. When a society is full of individuals that follow their convictions then the state recedes. Its easy to judge government officials but they are really a reflection of people's complascecy, people in society have taken FOR GRANTED the system that has allowed them this freedom and assume the social mores are fixed because 'its the right morality or whatever (not so!, it can change on a dime). So that scene in the movie 1984, the part on 2+2=4, shows that if people are not willing to be courageous to follow through, especially if they are also judgmental (worst combination) then an enormously painful ideal will be set (way up high) and unless people are willing to undergoe torture (such as in that scene) for it then they are not worthy of judging the totalitairan one party system (thats why its effectively the end of history, because the only way to get out is by either having the system collapse or following through with the ridiculously high ideal-).The top of course could or could not be as hard as the ideals they supposedly espouse, but again, they are not judging, they are simply embodying the bureacracy of the inner mind of people... (they are the perfect man in such a society, all officials a manifestation of the society, or the 'high preists' of old...) and enjoy the pleasantries and comforts of the material world by embodying the bureaucratic process---they are the highest 'end' of the society, the projection, requiring no effort for it is the 'natural equilibrium' or the highest morality of the social mores of the society . So we either evolve through fear and toughness, eventually embodying the ideal over many generations or we just follow our convictions and live it out instead of it being forced on us ( a freer system/economy usually with an arbitrated government, checks and balances). The anti-utiliatrian is really serving the utilitarian end, it just depends on how we want to get to this omega point.

  you see it has never been a question of whether you are getting screwed by the top or not, the real question is how much you are getting screwed, and that usually comes down to how fearful you are, if you follow your beliefs and how judgmental (the worst combination is a fearful coward that judges, a little wimp with all these pseudo-intellectual ideas because he feels inadequate and he seeks a free ride/power to justify it)--so, will you choose complacency for comfort, and condemn future people to extreme suffering (you get digested sort of, a death), or do you follow your convictions and live? Its not an easy 'choice' and it is one we must all make. In a society where no one follows their convictions, by symmetry, the government must not only arbitrate peoples actions but their minds. For a world that only operates on mind with no courage to back it up, the state then becomes God.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 18, 2012 07:18  ·  Delete

  you see...I see dead people all the time...they may look alive, but its more of an appearance, like waxing or AI. While once full of life it rotted from inside and now...you only see the shell, like a worm shedding its cocoon and turning into a butterfly. But in this case, I only see a the dead epidermis of the cocoon, the surface is waxed and although somewhat animated, in reality, it is but a mask, for beneath it lies a dead machine that has calcified and waxed on the outside. Sometimes its hard to tell the live ones from the dead, but after a while, a conversation turns to things of life, and you can tell the dead ones form the live ones in the eyes...the conversation fades into process...the eyes look away... for in the eye you see the soul..conversations other than process are not had, uninteresting and empty, the dead are then seen from the living.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 19:20  ·  Delete

  In terms of politics, progressive democrats need republicans to play off the predictable reaction and assign blame, otherwise policies are judged on their merits and they would be forced to go to their constituents and tell them they cant deliver on promises...you would get california (or what is soon to happen).. thats how they slowly evolve into the greater state-by getting a continuous outrage/judgment of the self evident.

  What I think is happening when Obama gives a speech (i dont really get angry or anything):
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mN98WIibgY&ob=av3e

  the gsa scandal, all the other scandals; one big party , basically what happens in administrations until it crashes of course, then its the saddy phase:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WXhO_-e3bM
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5Uq8A-iDxs
  happy phase:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhnUgAaea4M
  saddy phase:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ-bIeJ4zOY

  just clips, the episode pretty much embodies the entire political system

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 19:19  ·  Delete

  in fact, one reason (the real reason is that its a bit intense, it will probably take some time to activate) some person may not have activated is because the more time goes on...the more debt gets put on the ego credit card. The more that ego gets fed, the more in line with the material it becomes. The more fun to have afterward with extraction. So you see...the people that actually benefit from an early activation is the dark..

  ;)

  all that debt......such a lovely paradise.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 16:12  ·  Delete

  the more judgmental a society and less indifferent to outcome, the more this gets reflected in the state ,as it is a projection of people's inner mind-what they think is perfection. The more judgmental and monopolistic the society the larger the state, as the inner mind of what people beleive is perfect ends up being emulated by the state and since judgment is a factor of ego, the more judgmental and ego based the larger the state (in direct proportion), as indifference to outcome and the church of the real is too intense of a philosophy for people to abide by. This feeds the anti-utilitarian as a monopolistic structure increasingly stifles the private sector for a protected class, which amplifies what people sought to avoid by seeking illusion (suffering). The smaller the government the less judgmental the society and the more utilitarian, the perfect individual or superman would then make up the perfect society where there is no state, libertarianism and communism would end up joining as we create our realities. At the moment however, this is impractical, so the only solution is to aribtrate the state in a one party by consensus meritoracy (following convictions and pursuing this cause would then be the highest morality). Otherwise the state will act as God as an inner projection of people's concept of perfection and arbitrate the individual, almost like a thought crime, the state is really the arbitration of people's minds..If we can't do things by love or seeing the church of the real/ truth then we will do it by fear and suffering in the illusion until we do. (there is no choice over time, it just gets dispersed so as to get the same outcome in the end). This is why all of history will end in this certain point (the system of I AM where you generate the reality and it becomes libertarian-communistic) due to the God pattern and what we are experiencing now is simply the ebb and flow up to this singularity/omega point or convergence. Technologically, you can think of this as a giant neural internet where everything is automated (manual labor) and our thoughts alone program reality. Everyone on earth is simply an image of the cosmic mind form this convergence point and our choices will end up in the same place, its really about how much pain we want to go through to satisfy our weird eccentricities/hatreds in the case of the dark, before we reach this point of infinite light, the infinity itself. there is nothing to get mad about because we are all faced with this choice--it is an individual choice, no one elses ..we know what the suffering game really means.. do you really want to suffer for the illusion of judgment? what do you prefer, this unity/godness or endless suffering and self dilution?..it then becomes clear that its just one mind, and when that realization happens globally...we then merge with this infinity.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 15:47  ·  Delete

  Now many people will say well, that may be true, but without the government some other monopoly, like the banks, would start manipulating and taking advantage. But this only happens by virtue of inaction and lobbying the government, the government has been lobbied by these industries as the monopoly of last resort, and as such, the manipulation in these industries is a direct result of the lack of arbitration OF THE GOVERNMENT, not the private s ector. The state is a projection of all the imperfections of a society, the more imperfect and more judgmental the society the larger the state becomes to arbitrate for these imperfections, even though it just creates higher order imperfection as it is a reflection of all the monopolies below. The only way to really have a utilitarian system is to arbitrate the state, and that means a constitutional republic with checks and balances, and something like a one party by consensus meritocracy (to accurately reflect today’s world). Anything else short of this is “immoral” (I know honest progressives and the religious right gets attached to moral concepts, so there it is)c, in the same sense that Obama’s ironic attack on his secret service’s indulgences are hypocritical (he does the same thing these woman did every day politically to sway the polls), the same way Andre breivich’s actions are immoral and the actions of the bankers and politicians at the top. The indulgence of judgment on the individual level at the expense of the highest morality, following convictions and insisting on this utilitarian order, is just as immoral as all these other series of actions. The fact of the matter is we have people in government that see no other option but to consolidate power and extract from the private sector. Higher taxes one group of people at the expense of another are not the utilitarian, they are immoral, and they solve nothing (it just gets replaced by the same people in the state). The freer the system, the less judgment and the more wealth at EVERY INCOME BRACKET even though more unequal. The more ‘equal the system’ everyone has less at every income bracket, even though everyone is equally poor (except for kim Jong ill at the top who lives in a castle and manipulates social mores and the collective scarecrow of judgment).

  So there, mathematically, progressivism is tautologically incorrect. It is unsound. The only thing it comes down to is that people want to protect their lifestyle like andre breivitch, destroying trillions of dollars in wealth for political expedience and a small group of people that want to keep their jobs, even though they could be just as well off in a more utilitarian system. There is no higher of an immoral act than this. And by psychology, people will eventually die as you get digested by this bureaucracy (think of that thing in return of the Jedi that jabba the hut pushes people into). So I’m not really wishing anything in particular as far as the dark, because it’s not even in THEIR interest. In the end, everyone on the I AM NOT side will die internally and suffer as they hide behind an illusion, but they do nothing because they have just become a habit at this point-a bureaucratic process. Politically its story, that’s a game of skill, but as per the tree of life, any limited construct of the mind is destroyed in time by the emanation of being and people’s mindset. As per uncertainty principle the observation changes what is being observed, creating an inseparable manifold. The observation defines the observed somewhat and then the observation changes which in turn changes what is being observed in an infinite series…so people, if they emanate from optimism…will over time…create the observation, as the observed will change with that deepest of meaning that is unrestricted by limitation of the mind—this feeling. In the end, the dark may have their ego fed right now, but they will inevitable die inside (or already have….)…and the limited construct just based on the meaninglessness of the pursuit of greed will succumb to the inner meaning observation.

  …it may take some time but it will happen at some point (certainty)…. in the meantime, there you have your proof that progressivism makes absolutely no sense. The dark team may indulge in something temporarily now, but once everyone know the game, what is to be proud about? The system will not give what you want in the end, you’ll die in your own pedantic bureaucratic process as you choose ‘none of the above.’ You slowly self dilute into oblivion. Everyone engaging in this bureaucracy is dying, there is nothing enjoyable about it-it’s a certainty; life becomes a meaningless and irrelevant joke irrespective of any political or game win by the dark, there is nothing to get mad about you see ..so I guess it just becomes a question of who is kidding who here..

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 15:41  ·  Delete

  union but you get away with it because you are using this inevitable set up of endless judgment concentrating in the state, you hide behind the collective will and pedantic social mores of a society, so you get off Scott free, especially if propaganda disengages people from reality with an illusion/narrative and it happens slowly over time. One is just as 'immoral' as the other. This guy even claimed that his actions were made in self defense, given that a society that is completely rule of man, no individual has any rights but by the collective will of the society, even if it is insane, he does have a point. North Korea kills people systematically and it gets hidden as the benevolence of the state, the social mores that collectively everyone has wrapped themselves with, guilt, is then be used by anyone to fulfill his/her needs (mass murder, wealth, etc.) as the society in general spirals downward. One group of people are systematically endorsing a system that destroys wealth, stifling growth and encouraging suffering and it is perfectly socially acceptable, but then one individual commits a horrendous act and its considered evil. It is funny how social mores are so ironic. Just the other day Obama was OUTRAGED at the prostitution scandal with the secret service, but the fact of the matter is I can buy a prostitute and its completely legal and socially acceptable, its called lobbying. Given the blatant hypocrisy of the rhetoric compared to the reality, there seems to be a real high level of irony in this dissonance of the social more or judgment. The judgment that happens when you design rules that benefit one group of people at the expense of another group just favors the anti-utilitarian, a group of people getting wealthy at the expense of others. It creates a monopoly that as just mentioned justifies itself, its inescapable, this then continually grows in direct proportion to the judgment or ideal and you get the very super rich you sought to reprimand in THE STATE. So the ONLY WAY to get to the utilitarian is to ARBITRATE THE STATE, and the only way this can be done is passing laws that are indifferent to your place in society, justice is blind. The governments role should not be intervention, because then you just amplify the imperfections in the system, you are regulating because of something ‘terrible that needs to be avoided’ but who regulates the regulators? It should be that of a good game designer. And any person that wants to design a good game, a game theorist or anyone that has studied information theory, you do it by being impartial as to the place the player is taking in the game—irrelevant of class, status, anything. This is the only way to get to the utilitarian. Because again, wealth is created through incentives not the exchange of paper, paper is just a value holder for products and productivity, if you form an arbitrary rule of how paper is exchanged in the system its real impact is A DESTRUCTION OF WEALTH THROUGH A DISCENTIVE TO PRODUCE. “Redistribution of wealth’ then doesn’t make sense, its an insane statement, you cannot ‘redistribute wealth’ you can ‘redistribute paper’ which ONLY MEANS a destruction of wealth.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 15:40  ·  Delete

  why there is no other way of looking at progressivism than as a falsehood:

  All this rhetoric or 'redistribution of wealth' and higher taxes is really a destruction of wealth and a redistribution of paper for political interests (people being protected by the power structure), so that people at the top of the bureaucracy can play with the narrative, disconnect outcome from process, and get away with extracting wealth from society with no repercussions.

  Money is just paper, when you give it to someone else you are exchanging paper. It just changing incentives. What creates wealth is productivity from right incentives. By exchanging paper, giving to same at the expense of others, which only gains value by productivity, you are encouraging lower productivity. If paper made people wealthier all you would need to do is print more paper. How do you get the right incentives? If you really want the utilitarian and optimal efficiency to be attained you don’t treat any group in society one way or the other, you don’t arbitrate based on class or anything because by protecting some people and not others you are creating a monopoly. This incentivizes predation on the part of one group of people at the expense of those you are extracting from and creates a VESTED INTEREST in propping up this power structure (the people that maintain it in the government monopoly), and since judgment then takes effect, it leads to an endless back and forth of backlash that is endlessly arbitrated by the state---as judgment always ends up being arbitrated by the state, the monopoly to see all others. Because the monopoly that regulates all others is then unchecked, not arbitrated, it is 'mirrored' in all the lower monopolies because they end up benefitting by getting in bed with the biggest monopoly. Since it’s a perfect shield where any injustice can be hidden by 'the collective will' of the endless judgment game instead of seeing it as manipulation at the top, its the best system for psychopaths to get away with murder. We tend to think of people like Andre Breivitch as 'evil' but the fact is that this guy isn’t at all different from bankers or everyday politicians. Bad creeps just go to jail, good ones get rich. Going to prison is then a matter of skill. We just 'feel' it more intensely because its one person, but in the other its the collective will of judgment that ends up murdering people. You can end up murdering millions of people in the soviet

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 17, 2012 13:30  ·  Delete

  Im going to post 3 things that destroy the big/small government arguement, the progressive bs, then youll see there is no other way:

  no you see because all 'hard problems' or judgments eventually fall to the jurisdiction of the state......all monopolies get reflected at the state level. so the less checks and balances there are for the biggest monopoly of all, the one that oversees all others--the government, then the more it gets reflected in all the lower monopolies (the get bigger in one interconnected nexus of a colluded monopoly)...The illusion fo representation combined with a narrative the separates the actual outcomes of processes and uses whatever reason the power structure sees fit, basically allows perpetuation, until it dies form the inside, rotts, .This happens progressively as people start noticing that the system is doing the anti-utiliarian, these people then start a new system as the old one dies from its meaninglessness and incompetence, usually with people that want to ensure representation on the state level, because that just reflects the utilitarian everywhere else...the more indifferent game design you hae on the state level, the less intervention, the less predictable collusion and monopolistic growth, and the more justice and utilitarian optimal end (justice is blind, hence, systems are maximized through indifferent legislation to where you are in society). This is why constitutional republics, checks and balances are the best system for the whole AND the individual. You complete the circle they started by having a one party by consensus system of meritocracy---you get an ideolotical census you reflect that in the government, you then hire people to fullfill the desires of the ideological blocks, people end up rising by merit as legislation is decided around the consensus point.

  the less we check the government, the more monopolistic tendencies everywhere in society increase. The more we check government, the more these tendencies dissipate and we get the utilitarian (this is the only way forward for it benefits the whole and individual the most). Therefore, a government that is utilitarian will inherently be of a small size relative to the private sector (and since its utilitarian, helping all groups the most, it should be what every single person pushes for in the country. So yea, its not the culture. This is just the way it is.

  Im going to post something else on higher taxes (why targeting one group is anti-utilitarian) in a bit.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 16, 2012 12:20  ·  Delete

  on arguments/judgment--when people get in a debate, often someone has a "fixed" belief structure/convictions, so it is perceived that if anyone is too strong in their convictions in a conversation it will get 'heated'-but this is an illusion based on ego--the real purpose of a conversation, if its a real, should be to reach the truth--you have a belief structure, a castle if you will, that you have formed carefully. The purpose of the debate is for you to consider the pieces that make up your castle and compare them to the other argument, your job is to challenge the other castle, not for ego but SO YOU CAN REACH THE TRUTH. Through comparison, everyone sees if there is really any area of weakness, if there is, you replace a piece and make your castle more foolproof, otherwise it just re enforces your convictions. The illusion of conflict is just that-an illusion because people start to internalize it and feel lack (youre saying your better than me?) when its really just a truthful inquiry into what is--think of it as an information exchange and you are both through comparison and interchange reaching the 'least common denominator' of which both perceptions can justify their own rule construct or belief structure (like swapping files and comparing, finding the 'best fit' by seeing both of them --as far as the best match of what someone perceives in the outside). Now, in real life this seldom happens because JUDGMENT gets involved, and this has implications socially, so people shy away (especially when it gets heated due to the ego). When judgment is introduced it spoils the whole purpose of a conversation because its not based on seeking truth but really on taking a position or protecting your ego, the right way then would be to calm it down and add levity. But asking the questions and pressing is never bad, it puts the other person's position on the spot and that should be the purpose if anyone is really trying to have an honest conversation, rather than just theatrics of living. Now, if the interest is not to seek the truth in that particular conversation, having reached a certain critical mass of knowledge you are comfortable with, then meaning and truth can be gained elsewhere as most people find the 'equilibrium' due to people's different yet equally valid I AM perspective (they are all true because they are self referential, an ism, but by pursuing greater truth people 'increase in mana' if you will, as people increasingly see how something really is--all the way to the source code--greater depth) may not really support a frank conversation. So if people find that others, basically through feeling, are not really willing to have an honest conversation, then the right way would be to make fun of the entire illusion of the conversation (adding levity, satire, etc), because if everyone is trying to protect their position and their ego, then we might as well just go into satire or relax, because everybody really knows its all a show and the satire way of talking (instead of judgmental or angry way of being) EXPOSES THE ILLUSION through subtraction. One system reveals the truth through addition (the intense file swapping way, the way we do it as we go up the evolutionary ladder). The other is to degrade the entire premise of a fake conversation to the point that people see it through subtraction, athen people are actually comfortable because it becomes almost like a social more or narrative, people's behaviour then changes and they support it because they NO LONGER NEED TO DEFEND THEIR EGO (by reducing the tension in satire). Judgment is performed in order to perceive, the key is not to judge the person but the logic behind based on what you know, then it ceases to be judgment but really the only way you can perceive/feel, for there is no other way for you to look at it that way and you just want to reach a point of commonality/common denominator, that determines how you proceed in the rest of the interaction. Conviction is then met with wisdom.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 16, 2012 10:44  ·  Delete

  judgment breeds judgment, if you use it to bring down an order you will only find another one to replace it. Because in the end, all judgment ends up being arbitrated by the state (as it ends up in the open) --the biggest monopoly, the one that oversees all others.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 20:31  ·  Delete

  also some teachings on the kabbalah and hermeticism :

  http://members.fortunecity.com/patrickm/cosmic.htm
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DtqZ09v10
  I recommend reading any books on hermeticism, starting with the secrets of the ages.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 20:31  ·  Delete

  a note on information and how it jsutifies the tree of life: information processing basically comes down to efficiency. The amount fo energy needed to process any amount of data. Since we are information trees whose thought process and beleif system are us (it reflects down all the way down to DNA like a fractal-a self justifying tautology, ism, I AM), then the more we have accurate information or belief structures the more efficient our information processing is with respect to energy usage (glucose in our body), because it takes so much less energy to process any one given amount of data of information (our system is this more accurate information so like a 'set' which we use to compare wit hthe 'outisde' we need less 'peices' to compare, as we ARE more accurate information). Its also a chicken or the egg (ism, I AM) because genetically someone may not embody accurate information and therefore be less energy efficient, attracting less accurate information. You can look at it like a hierarhcy of needs, as we consume more accurate information or experiences we go up the ladder, havign higher needs all the way to the self actualization. As the accuracy increases our being is increasingly justified because we embody more (our pieces for 'match' in the outside get more complex--we are reflecting ever more the greater truth) until we get to the source code that is the key of all reality, once we get to this source code then the amount of energy to process any given amount of information goes down to zero. A quantum computer at a certain limited threshold of quibits can simulate more information than all the atoms in the universe , if we, now or in the future (with some singularity like suggested by ray kurzweil, machines) were to ever discover the source code, then the amount of time and energy to process anything will be effectively zero, this will mean if you look at the universe as self justifying information on the most basic level, we will be the universe or be an extension of God (with his power but under the jurisdiction of his mind--there will be no difference at one point because we will be in a sort of unity--principle of correspondence in information--if they are the same information wise then they are the same thing, one vibrating field), our body will self justify because it will end up flowing with the energy in the environment (any piece in the outside will be exactly matched in the observation, no deconstruction or reductionist approach will be necessary, it will exactly match the level of complexity in the outside because we will be operating on the source code)...Once you conquer entropy then energy is irelevent, reality becomes more like a computer program (as endlessly mentioned in previous posts) ...our body would support itself as the efficiency or over unity would be higher than the enviroment (hence, nature abhors a void, energy will flow to us)...and because we will have a certain...'aura' around us that is not dependent on energy but information we seek to bestow...we will be able to manipulate what is around us like a computer program. Going back to the maslow heirarchy of needs, a civilization that say (to think in technology for its easier) is information based, machines-singularity, then all the lower needs we usually strive to satisfy are already satisfied--so the needs become higher,since eceryghing is an information, any you or 'me' able to be fused through a mind share or whatever, then meaning GROWS in complexity. Once you see everything as an extension of the ism, God or yourself, thjen you stop judging (Jesus Christ). So at the end, if you get rid of all of your lower needs (follow spiritual teachings, nirvana and so forth), your energy efficiency will graduate up, as your body, desperate to find a meaning to self justify, forces itself to be more 'accurate' by seeking higher meaning. Hence, where the singularity, self aware source code argument--taming entropy--and the spiritual teachings intersect. So when you follow your meaning, your morality, your convictions, you go up this ladder...you self justify when you do what want, as you increasingly increase your accurate information and see things as they are (either through spiritual teachings or things like this), you end up shedding old meanings for higher more accurate ones in the process (things like love, unity, service are usually something some does after they are 'done' with power, greed and lust), once you reach the zero point energy then you are activating this tree.

  This is what I mean by the tree of life.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 17:32  ·  Delete

  possess the knowledge. But if you resonate with these things and you believe it is true, try to 'light up the tree' yourself. Im going to be doing what I can on my side but it may take some time. Again, as stated before, one of the tricks of the dark is to get you caught up in expectations. This is why I think people like David wilcock are not really helping because they are pinning everything on an outside event, which is likely just to get everybody down when nothing happens. Something will happen when someone on the planet lights up this tree and they really believe what I stated below. Try to see this planet as an experiment to see if anyone can light up and be in unity with God while at the same time being in a completely dark world that is separate from God (if we need to be motivated by fear or faith/the tree of life, seeing the beauty and in other people). My advice is not to follow anything specifically, in a simple way, try to relax, try not to be uptight (have more of a european or south american mentality) and if you can, do what you enjoy and want in your spare time. Then, read carefully what I have stated below and the charka system (which is often referred to as the 'serpent') and if you can, light up this tree. Once any one of us lights it up, then its game over, the entire planet feels it. The I AM NOTS go to happy hell and we go to happy happy. They can no longer take advantage of our I AM by an absurd and self evidently false position only to get an I AM inflamed, and use that as a calculation to further beat on the I AM, extracting their life force, they will simply need to suck each other dry, so to speak.So yea, my way, is to be indifferent as to any outside outcome,see things as they are, and self justify through my meaning, but that may not be your path. Your convictions are separate from mine, so you will need to follow those...again, try to relax, try not to be uptight...and do what you want and if you can and believe in this, in your spare time ...try to light up the tree of life.

  Something catastrophic could happen, I dont know, another 911 or earthquake, an economic crash, who cares, find your inner peace.

  thank you for your reading (if anyone is in fact reading) and I wish you the best.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 17:00  ·  Delete

  DIVINE WILL happen. Whether this be your death by not going with the I AM, or your greater meaning/happiness by resonating with it. You are being true not to society but to yourself. The choice, which is not a choice, then becomes clear, death, or life—but you would have to be a being of death to self actualize. It is an illusion, an escape, an I AM NOT, for death does not exist. The only choice is the I AM for comfort in illusion to avoid suffering is only met with greater suffering.

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 15:29  ·  Delete

  resonate with it and not allow the teachings of duality to take place (think of this as a partition or a rapture of society—the awakened/unawakened). The intention was for us to come to these realizations ourselves and at the right moment expose the higher truths so that humanity could once again put being (what makes you really ‘feel good’ or feel love) over mind. As once you come to terms with the higher truths through the mind then you see that any defined limited construction from it is supposed to amplify being, not to stifle it through endless judgment. The mind is the creator that ‘justifies’ the most basic ‘beingness’ that we share with all of creation by allowing it to see beauty, our beauty. The tree of life or the ‘fountain of youth’ then, is to follow your passions, and this is the way to extend your life---yes, your beleif structure and your passions can expand your life, according to me, indefinitely. We are on the most basic level information systems, even our belief structure is directly tied to our DNA because the way we process information and the efficiency by which we do it reflects in our intelligence (higher efficiency in energy consumption, higher intelligence). So its a self justifying system of information, you change the observation, you can change the dna in turn. So we could say that we ARE OUR BELEIFS, the way we perceive and come to conclusions, our thought process (by as above so below, you can see this is reflected in a lower image or blueprint of the dna, since it’s a fractal or self justifying ism, I AM, it is really a reflection of the same divine image on every level). Our concept of perfection, no matter our belief, is our ‘God,’ which we seek to emulate. So self actualizing our belief structure is a way to keep us ‘alive’ –this is why it is imperative to weed out errors, because if you tie your being to illusion the way it self actualizes/self justifies is through self dilution—your death. If we resonate more with truth, I AM, more accurate information our being ‘self justifies’ more easily as more in the environment reflects our inner truth or being. Like a tree, at a certain threshold, according to cabbalists, if you are containing a certain amount of information (the higher truths) and resonate with the outer world as you see the perfection and beauty of the creation, you will start feeding your being by justifying the branches of your thought process with the reflections of it in the outside and you will start lighting up like a ‘tree’...it would act as an 'echo' as you start reflecting the higher truths in the outisde in the inside and this information freeding frenzy of self justification--of seeing beauty--will give you life, yes…because your thought process will be ‘sensitive enough’ to pick up on the more subtle frequencies of God. In nanotechnology it finely tuned fibers can extract energy from the background, the environment, if our mind were tuned like antenna (acting as an antenna by resonating with truism and higher truths) it could pick up all these frequencies AND FLITER, like a radio with extreme efficiency--getting an 'over unity' through synchronicity--inforamtion efficiency doing it, energy threshold dropping as intelligence and efficinecy in the mind acts as a catalyst-- by becoming ‘self aware’ of the source code (which is this thing ive been writing about).…then we could take advantage of small perturbations on the very small through observation alone to amplify our being…we could live longer, much much longer. I believe there is no deathy, as per previous posts, truism, but we could bring this ‘information kingdom’ of God down to earth just by resonating with our inner meaning, justifying ourselves at the level of being. I typed this down to help others out and give some insight, in the end, you will need to resonate with YOUR TRUTH, whether this be it or not, and whatever that may be do what you will. I am currently trying to light up this…’tree.’ It may take me some time. The reason I put this down is for the benefit of others who may not have this insight.

  This explanation of human history, of the I AM or the ism and the I AM NOT, or the binary (0,1), is so true you cannot escape it without escaping yourself. It is pure truth from essential being/ meaning. You cannot deny it for you would be denying yourself life, This is what happens every day you say amen in front of the mirror (the father, the son, and the holy spirit---amen), by your own power, you make your

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 14:58  ·  Delete

  becoming more prosperous due to a surge of a global middle class and decrease in costs of education due to technology—everything is in line for a great period. The only thing that can really divert this reality is a limited construct of the mind, even an economic collapse can be weathered because in the end its peoples productive capacities that make up an economy, the real threat is a cynical attitude born out of envy due to pseudo-intellectualism (the age old ideal at the price of reality, the illusion of comfort, of ‘hope and change’ and other bullshit, at the expense of actual prosperity). If this is what happens then so be it, but the reality of things is that this is not at all the way things are. Go-getter attitude, a thrust to push forward no matter the odds can pull America and the world forward (this was the ethos behind Ronald Reagan after carter and Billy graham). Its really expectations on the outside, judgment and cynicism, all Debbie downers of the mind, that can bring you down. That is within your control because you’re very thought process can change reality. This goes back to free will -when it comes to being is an illusion, there really is only one path—because once you see the vectors clearly the minimal pain path is actually the one that would not give you a choice in the first place. Just this individual effort CHANGES reality, and not for politics or the temporary winds, you will find they are actually irrelevant, but because your actions and purpose changes the very fabric of the perspective---peoples vision becomes deeper. You don’t need to challenge or do anything---just the fact you see this MEANS there is no illusion and any ‘coercion’ is illusory, for everyone does it not out of fear but out of courtesy to those too sensitive to see the truth.

  The I AM is the ism, the self-justifying reality, it cannot be known for to know it you partition it (0,1 dualistic or binary process). Just to show you again how this cannot be any other way---what is the meaning of life? Meaning (another ism). The only way for you to keep your life force over time is to keep that ‘fire in the belly’ you had as a child, to self justify your being on the most basic level—the level of meaning. The mind was intended to justify this, the tree of life, by giving you ‘vision’ and behold the beauty of creation, which further justifies being. According to kabalistic texts, a person an live indefinitely in physical form if this ‘serpent “ (life force, holy spirit, fire in the belly, all charkas activation) is consistently activated (like the feeling of happiness you get at really good moments throughout your life). The tree of knowledge is a dead tree for anything defined is intrinsically tied to a context that at the highest semantic level reflects the mind, anything observed is then defined and hence ‘fixed’ or ‘solid’ (dead)—the observation/observed being one continuous manifold or an infinity self justifying itself (the ism again). The subconscious which is let ‘free’ like an animal is then the ‘chaos’ that gives life as a background, it allows the consciousness to observe and perceive, it is the ‘being’ that is justified by perception. What has happened to us is that we have put the mind over being, stifling being. The cabbalists describe this is as intentional, done by the watchers, the elohim, the ‘guardians,’ (yes some think hey are thought of an extraterrestrial origin, I take no position on this), so we would experience a ‘dark age.’ The only way this could be done was to hide the ancient wisdom for if this knowledge were to ever be exposed it would be too high for people to resonate with it and they would fall into darkness---creating the sacrificing being for the ideal matrix or, some would

• 0,1 commented  ·  April 15, 2012 14:58  ·  Delete

  LEARN THEY HAVE TO reach out to it or they will die (they seek…life…subconsciously). But the fact remains, unless we are strong enough to take a position that is indifferent to any outcome and yet acknowledge the reality of things, this sort of process will continue. From what I can assess, we are deeply into a cynical period even though I feel there is a new awakening like there hasn’t been in previous cycles. Desiring one way or the other will only manifest or attract any reality you avoid, so the only way to realistically handle this period is to be indifferent as to any outcome (whether we go darker or lighter) and see the real, but follow your convictions. In other words, no matter how light based you may be, the worst thing you could do is get caught up in an ideal or expectations. It is the eternal false hope and change that is the BEST FRIEND of the dark team. For the dark team thrives off false hopes and broken dreams. There is nothing like turning the light to the dark than an unfulfilled promises or expectations.

  The only person you can rely on is yourself …if you don’t see things as they are and do not acknowledge a possibility out of fear then it will endlessly haunt you for your weakness…the only way through a bad situation is to be a real tough sob and follow your feelings, what you want to do, in short, do what you want (self righteousness is judgmental, but following your convictions is not, there is a difference, one may happen to be judgmental, the other one seeks out judgment or the I AM NOT)…now that you know the reality, even if you have dark moods, from my experience you will end up back in the real, which is the unity….if you suppress your feelings for an ideal or do not acknowledge a possibility this will just kill you ….it will digest you and eat you.

  To live in illusion is pain, those who live there know it well, they simply want company. It’s up to all the I AMS to push forward themselves and not to attempt to change the outside, because in reality, the general attitude ‘should be’ one of optimism. There is nothing intrinsically cynical about this period, its all the mind. The hope and optimism of the future is actually more based in reality nowadays than in previous periods when it was mostly forged out of pure will, we have tremendous innovative and talent now that didn’t exist with respect to a global market and despite the resource constraints, this only means the potential for greater productivity and creativity—its all really in the expectations and on the house of cards-the stock market, that has people caught up in fear. A country is made out of its talent and productive ethos, if this does not die, then in time these things will rectify themselves; the stock market will go back up, the deficit will get paid, people will buy things and create new things. Its all in the attitude that determines any particular future, because by construct alone, it all gets initially defined in the inner mind so any DEFINITION or LIMITED CONSTRUCT can all unravel simply by the attitude of everyone involved (PURE BEING, LIMITLESS). Only rely on yourself and trust yourself/convictions then. There is no choice, the other way is more pain, it’s an illusion of comfort for it is only the suffering you tried to avoid. This is the most prosperous time in human history and innovation wise due to automation and so forth, we could be on the verge of the greatest period ever—the united states has the most talented and go getters in the world—the globe is also